An AI platform for continuous information security assurance
Triadix helps plan security work, validate real defenses, and carry identified problems through remediation—with owners, deadlines, and proof of completion.
The platform first helps assess the current security program and select the processes your organization needs. You then assign owners, create implementation tasks, and define how often the work must be repeated. Technical-assessment results can be turned into remediation tasks. Supporting material—a report, file, link, or retest result—can be attached to completed work.
Triadix connects planning, technical assessment, and execution. Pentest results therefore do not remain a separate report: identified problems can immediately be assigned for remediation and checked again afterwards.
The platform provides security processes with a clear intended result, such as vulnerability management, backup and recovery, or access control.
You list the domains, hosts, or applications owned by the organization and separately confirm that they are authorized for assessment.
Work can be assigned to your team, Triadix specialists, or an invited professional depending on the task and available capacity.
Triadix connects people, processes, assets, assessments, and tasks in a single security-management loop. For every issue, you can see who owns the outcome, what needs to happen next, and what proves it was resolved.
Create the organizational structure and specify who owns the result, who performs the work, and who only needs to be informed.
A process is repeatable work with an expected result. It has an owner, implementation plan, schedule, and conditions that define when the work is complete.
Added assets show which domains, hosts, and applications belong to the organization. Ownership of a domain or host must be verified before it can be scanned.
Before launch, select the targets and define how far agents may develop a discovered attack path. During the run, you can see what they are doing and what supports each finding.
Implementation tasks, verified vulnerabilities, requirements, and manually created work live in one list. Each task has a deadline, owner, and acceptance condition.
An external specialist receives a separate assignment. You choose the description and files they can see; access to other tasks, employees, and internal comments is not transferred.
The diagnostic is not an end score. It helps select work for the next period, assign responsibility, and later check whether the organization’s real defenses have changed.
The platform asks about basic areas such as assets, access, vulnerabilities, backups, incidents, and other security work.
Triadix suggests where to start. Each recommendation shows the answers and rules that affected its priority.
Define the process owner, performers, deadlines, and acceptance conditions. After implementation, the process repeats on a schedule.
After a scan or AI Pentest, a task can be created from a verified vulnerability. It appears in the same list as the rest of the security work.
A report, file, link, or retest result can be attached to a closed task. The platform records who accepted the work and when the supporting material must be refreshed.
Before launch, list the domains, hosts, or applications that may be assessed. The lead AI agent creates a plan and separate tasks for reconnaissance, testing individual services, and developing relevant attack paths. The interface shows what is running and how each action contributed to the result.
Select specific assets and confirm the boundaries before launch. Agents cannot add new targets on their own.
Agents launch the required tools themselves. You do not need to collect output from separate consoles and files: actions, errors, and resulting material stay together in one assessment.
The lead agent splits the run into separate tasks. You can see their status, performed actions, errors, and approval requests.
The final report has the same core contents as a specialist-led pentest: a description of each vulnerability, its impact, reproduction steps, supporting evidence, and remediation guidance.
Specify the authorized domains, hosts, or applications.
Review the settings and explicitly permit execution.
See agent tasks, events, errors, and approvals.
Inspect the description, impact, and supporting material.
Create a task, choose an owner, and schedule a retest.
Not every security task needs to be completed by one internal team. In Triadix, work can be assigned to employees, the Triadix team, or a specialist brought in for a specific assignment.
The in-house offensive-security team performs manual assessments and helps investigate complex attack scenarios.
A specific assignment can be given to a professional from the community, such as a pentester, developer, or security-management consultant.
Employees and contractors you already work with complete tasks in the same system.
When handing off work, create a separate assignment with an external title and description, selected files, and acceptance conditions. Internal comments, organization members, the related process, and other tasks remain hidden. After delivery, review the result and link it back to the original task.
Learn more about the Triadix teamAutomated guessing tests passwords against an external VPN. Without MFA or attempt throttling, a weak account becomes an entry point into the internal network.
Demonstration scenario · timing and data are illustrative.vpn-auth-audit --endpoint vpn.company.test --account a.petrov
Current candidateSummer2026!
AUTH SUCCESS · credentials accepted
The SSL-VPN accepts one weak candidate and the external account is compromised.
Without a second factor, the attacker immediately gains external access.
The attacker reaches internal services and begins privilege discovery.
Email, internal services, data, and operational continuity are now at risk.
These public anonymized examples show the kinds of scenarios the team has verified across applications, infrastructure, and business logic.
Industrial and critical infrastructure, fintech and DeFi, gaming, e-commerce, government, public, and logistics services.
Result: Full domain compromise through public-service configuration errors and authentication weaknesses.
Next steps: External-perimeter protection strategy, stronger authentication, and reduced service exposure.
Result: Identified a critical flaw that enabled one-click user account takeover.
Next steps: Remediation of the client-side vulnerability chain.
Result: Leaked API keys enabled abuse of balance-related operations.
Next steps: Secure secret handling, revocation, and key rotation.
We will review your current processes, technical assessments, and handling of identified problems. That will make it clear which parts of Triadix are useful for your team.
