Red Teaming
Full targeted-attack simulation, APT emulation, and validation of detection and response processes.
Validate defenses through realistic attack scenarios
The Triadix team runs comprehensive assessments of applications, infrastructure, and detection processes. We define critical scenarios with the customer, investigate the attack surface manually, and document verified impact on business systems.
Four hands-on assessment disciplines
The format follows the architecture, security maturity, and organizational goal—from a focused application assessment to a targeted-attack simulation.
Web & API Security
Manual discovery of logical and technical weaknesses across GraphQL, REST, OAuth, and business logic.
Infrastructure Pentest
Deep assessment of external and internal perimeters, networks, clouds, and Active Directory.
Source Code Review
White-box code and architecture analysis, SAST/DAST, and development of Secure SDLC practices.
One scenario from assessment objective to verified outcome
Before work starts, we agree on critical assets, permitted actions, and outcome criteria. During the engagement, specialists develop attack chains manually, validate impact, and retain evidence for joint review with technical and management teams.
Recurring validation
New vulnerabilities and attack paths appear continuously, so practical assessment becomes a repeatable part of the security program.
Technical work connected to management
Assessment results move directly into recommendations, tasks, retesting, and decisions about the security architecture.
- 01
Define the objective
Agree on business systems, threat scenarios, scope, and rules of engagement.
- 02
Investigate the surface
Build technical context and identify the most significant paths for progressing an attack.
- 03
Validate impact
Manually confirm exploitation chains and their impact within agreed constraints.
- 04
Transfer evidence
Review findings, priorities, and technical measures with the responsible teams.
Engagements become concrete security improvements
These public anonymized examples show the kinds of scenarios the team has verified across applications, infrastructure, and business logic.
Industrial and critical infrastructure, fintech and DeFi, gaming, e-commerce, government, public, and logistics services.
Result: Full domain compromise through public-service configuration errors and authentication weaknesses.
Next steps: External-perimeter protection strategy, stronger authentication, and reduced service exposure.
Result: Reconstructed the attack chain through domain-admin privilege escalation and identified access and logging failures.
Next steps: Trust zones, least privilege, and recurring anomaly monitoring.
Result: Identified a critical flaw that enabled one-click user account takeover.
Next steps: Remediation of the client-side vulnerability chain.
Result: Found points-farming scenarios involving unrestricted cashback categories and a race condition during club enrollment.
Next steps: Redesign of accrual architecture and transactional operation flows.
Result: Found data-validation and low-level-call weaknesses creating DoS and balance-abuse risks.
Next steps: Function refactoring, strict typing, fail-safe mechanisms, and rollback systems.
Result: Executed DC Shadow and lateral-movement scenarios through misconfigured trust zones.
Next steps: Team training, stronger AD protection, network segmentation, and corrected trust configuration.
Result: Leaked API keys enabled abuse of balance-related operations.
Next steps: Secure secret handling, revocation, and key rotation.
Result: Found two account-takeover vectors: OAuth-token theft through open redirect and XSS in SVG avatars.
Next steps: Reworked CORS policies, redirect validation, and user-content filtering.
Result: Found Blind XSS that enabled access to the administration panel.
Next steps: Stronger Content Security Policy and server-side user-data filtering.
Assessment results can become part of an ongoing security operating loop
The platform connects assets, findings, owners, tasks, and remediation verification so work continues after the engagement ends.
Explore the platformLet’s discuss the objective and the right assessment format
Describe the system, environment, or scenario you need to validate. The team will help define an appropriate scope and engagement format.